Bug 1067213

Resolved by https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/539912 (otw to Factory, I assume it will be picked up by SLE-15 also)

Turns out our initial evaluation of the problem was wrong

The situation is as follows

the fontpackages macros generate scriptlets matching the name /var/adm/update-scripts/$PACKAGENAME

Where $PACKAGENAME is the "name:" defined in the packages .spec file

libzypp only runs scriptlets that match the name /var/adm/update-scripts/$ACTUALPACKAGENAME

Wheree $ACTUALPACKAGENAME is the actual name used by the user to install the package

This bug was caused therefore by the recent rename & split of google-noto-fonts to noto-sans-fonts & noto-emoji-fonts, etc etc and the similar rename/split of ghostscript-fonts to ghostscript-fonts-std and -other

The noto- package maintainers have already fixed their subpackages by calling

> %reconfigure_fonts_scriptlets -n noto-sans-fonts

and such for each of the split packages in their spec file. They just need to send the fixes to Factory.

However, ghostscript is still broken because it is running the %reconfigure_fonts* macros with the package name 'ghostscript-fonts' and not running the macros once each for the split font package names

Johannes, please fix ghostscript accordingly so the %reconfigure_fonts* macros are run for the new -std and -other names and not the (broken) ghostscript-fonts name

Takashi and I are reverting the fontpackages change that disabled the generation of the /var/adm/update-scripts scriptlets

Richard Brown,
in ghostscript-fonts.spec the %reconfigure_fonts* macros are run
only for its -std and -other subpackage names:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
$ osc cat Printing ghostscript-fonts ghostscript-fonts.spec | grep -E '%post|%reconfigure_fonts'

%post std
%reconfigure_fonts_post

%postun std
%reconfigure_fonts_postun

%posttrans std
%reconfigure_fonts_posttrans

%post other
%reconfigure_fonts_post

%postun other
%reconfigure_fonts_postun

%posttrans other
%reconfigure_fonts_posttrans
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Or do you want that to be changed that each %reconfigure_fonts_* macro
is called with an explicitly added '-n <subpackage_name>' option like:

%post std
%reconfigure_fonts_post -n std

%postun std
%reconfigure_fonts_postun -n std

%posttrans std
%reconfigure_fonts_posttrans -n std

%post other
%reconfigure_fonts_post -n other

%postun other
%reconfigure_fonts_postun -n other

%posttrans other
%reconfigure_fonts_posttrans -n other

If yes, since what openSUSE version is the '-n <subpackage_name>'
option supported for the %reconfigure_fonts_* macros?

If the %reconfigure_fonts_* macros support '-n <subpackage_name>'
since openSUSE > 12.2 everything is o.k.
If not I would need additional '%if 0%{?suse_version}' cases.

-n should be supported in all supported openSUSE versions (openSUSE 12.2 is not a supported version)

This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration:
This bug (1067213) was mentioned in
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/558096 Factory / ghostscript-fonts

Hopefully fixed via
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/558096

during dup on Tumbleweed I got

Output of ghostscript-fonts-std-9.06-9.1.noarch.rpm %posttrans script:
    /var/adm/update-scripts/posttransFVzq9s/ghostscript-fonts-std-9.06-9.1.noarch.rpmrZu6PR: line 23: -n: command not found
Output of ghostscript-fonts-other-9.06-9.1.noarch.rpm %posttrans script:
    /var/adm/update-scripts/posttransFVzq9s/ghostscript-fonts-other-9.06-9.1.noarch.rpmzWnfGG: line 23: -n: command not found


and indeed the %reconfigure_fonts_posttrans macro seems to not support any args

so
rpm -q --scripts ghostscript-fonts-other
shows that it expanded to
[...]
    rm /run/fontpackages/reconfigure-fonts-cjk 
  fi 
   -n ghostscript-fonts-other
exit 0

(In reply to Richard Brown from comment #4)
> -n should be supported in all supported openSUSE versions (openSUSE 12.2 is
> not a supported version)

This was the mis-information on this bug - -n is ONLY known to %reconfigure_fonts_scriptlets, but not to the other %reconfigure_fonts_* macros

*** Bug 1076986 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***