|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Softlink rcnovell-zmd is not created | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 10.2 | Reporter: | Magnus Boman <mboman> |
| Component: | Zenworks | Assignee: | E-mail List <zlm-code10-bugs> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | QA Contact: | Jawaad Tariq <jtariq> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | andreas.hanke |
| Version: | Alpha 4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Other | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Magnus Boman
2006-09-18 23:30:45 UTC
Just noticed that we do create rczmd, but it's confusing, cause all other rcxxx contains the full name of the init.d script. In many cases there are /etc/init.d/xxx and /usr/sbin/rcxxx where xxx is equal, but not in all cases. I'd like to see a written document which proves that this is a standard. In general, what happens to people who already started using either /etc/init.d/novell-zmd or /usr/sbin/rczmd? Renaming either of them will break compatibility. Might this be a duplicate of bug 190025? I second andreas. Change request rejected. |