Bug 210944

Summary: Text disappears on light menu entries activated with mouse pointer
Product: [openSUSE] openSUSE 10.2 Reporter: Terje J. Hanssen <terjejhanssen>
Component: GNOMEAssignee: E-mail List <gnome-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: E-mail List <qa-bugs>
Severity: Normal    
Priority: P5 - None CC: andreas.hanke, terjejhanssen
Version: Alpha 5   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: x86-64   
OS: Other   
Whiteboard:
Found By: Other Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---
Attachments: Attached screenshot_firefox.jpg

Description Terje J. Hanssen 2006-10-08 21:24:01 UTC
A visual issue in application's pulldown menus (i.e Firefox), is that when pointing on menu entries with the mouse pointer, the activated text becomes invisible on the light (white) menu entry (maybe due to text vs background colors). Default setup of desktop background and colors were used
Comment 1 Terje J. Hanssen 2006-10-10 09:12:50 UTC
Created attachment 101092 [details]
Attached screenshot_firefox.jpg

Here the mouse cursor is here pointing on the Firefox drop-down menu File>Print. The text disappear on the active "Print" menu entry.
Comment 2 JP Rosevear 2006-10-17 01:01:10 UTC
64 bit, I assume this is the old 32bit theme engine not installed error.

Gary, do you remember what we need to install to fix this like in SLED 10?
Comment 3 Andreas Hanke 2006-10-17 01:13:07 UTC
gtk2-engines-32bit:

http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/2821307/com/gtk2-engines-32bit-2.6.5-5.x86_64.rpm.html

It is already part of the gnome_basis-32bit pattern:

http://ftp.opensuse.org/pub/opensuse/distribution/SL-OSS-factory/inst-source/suse/setup/descr/gnome_basis-32bit-10.2-49.x86_64.pat

But it's not getting installed because the pattern is supposed to be pulled in via "Freshens/Supplements" which doesn't work: Bug 210538
Comment 4 Gary Ekker 2006-10-17 15:12:55 UTC
Correct, this is indeed part of the pattern and on the media. Just need to get the resolver fixed.
Comment 5 JP Rosevear 2006-10-18 01:46:51 UTC
Who should this bug go to then?
Comment 6 Gary Ekker 2006-10-18 16:13:27 UTC
Resolving as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 210538 ***