|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Incorrect warning during installation "almost no disk space left" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 10.2 | Reporter: | Richard Bos <richard.bos> |
| Component: | Installation | Assignee: | Ladislav Slezák <lslezak> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Jiri Srain <jsrain> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | peter.schlaf, rhardy703 |
| Version: | Beta 2 plus | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i586 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Beta-Customer | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: |
Log files
Incorrect disk full error message |
||
|
Description
Richard Bos
2006-11-19 21:45:17 UTC
Created attachment 106172 [details]
Log files
Well, /mnt is where the new / (root) file system is mounted. There are only 140 MB left. You'll get that warning if any file system gets filled up to 90% or more and those remaining 10% are less than 90 MB. I can't tell from the logs exactly which package triggered that warning, but only 301 MB for / looks awfully small to me. You don't need that much to get that filled; just think of all the stuff that may go to all kinds of subdirectories in /etc. For example, I have 6.4 MB in /etc/opt, 2.7 MB in /etc/X11, 2.7 MB in /etc/cups, 2.3 MB directly in /etc. That makes 21.0 MB total in all of /etc. If you get that warning, there is very likely a good reason for it. > I can't tell from the logs exactly which package triggered that warning, but > only 301 MB for / looks awfully small to me. I have used this setup for quite some years and never got this warning. I adapted a previous arrangement as that was too smalll to have the kernel updated. > You don't need that much to get > that filled; just think of all the stuff that may go to all kinds of > subdirectories in /etc. I have 58 MB in /etc/ and /bin is 7.1 MB and /boot is 7.8 MB. 300 MB is plenty of room for "/", especially after the installation as I have 140 MB left. > Well, /mnt is where the new / (root) file system is mounted. There are only 140 > MB left. You'll get that warning if any file system gets filled up to 90% or > more and those remaining 10% are less than 90 MB. So 90% of 300 M is 270M. 140 MB is currently available: 270 - 140 = 130 MB. So there should be a package that uses more 130 MB of diskspace? # for i in $(rpm -ql OpenOffice_org); do [[ -f $i ]] && ls -l $i; done | awk '{total += $5 } END {print total}' 283622759 With is the same as: # rpm -q --qf "%{SIZE}\n" OpenOffice_org 283694447 Now let's how much is installed in /usr: # for i in $(rpm -ql OpenOffice_org | grep /usr); do [[ -f $i ]] && ls -l $i; done | awk '{total += $5 } END {print total}' 283578968 I assume that when I increase the "/" partition with 150MB (that means it size should become 300 + 150 = 450 M), the error won't be there. But this is hiding the root cause, isn't? Yast (or the tool that generates the error) is looking at the wrong partition, and is therefor giving this incorrect error message. But this is strange as the error, I believe, occurs before packages are really installed. I don't know who the calculation is done before the packages on the CD(3) are installed. Can anything be said about that? Something weird is going on indeed; I'm trying to install mediawiki, that requires some other pkgs. So I select these with yast, with comes with the message that / root will be occupied with more than 157% of diskspace. See attachment. The dependent packages are: cjk-latex-4.5.2-237.i586.rpm freetype-tools-1.3.1-1188.i586.rpm gd-2.0.32-44.i586.rpm latex-ucs-20041017-26.noarch.rpm te_latex-3.0-52.i586.rpm tetex-3.0-52.i586.rpm I installed those in /usr/tmp/install and the resuls is: # ls -1 | grep -v rpm etc sbin usr var Those directories require: 124K etc 20K sbin 212M usr 9,0M var So "/" gets only 144K (etc + sbin). The rest is stored in /usr (has 766 M free) and /var (which has 1.3GB) free. The only thing is that a check for the installed files (in /usr/tmp/install), that some files are missing: etc/texmf/ls-R etc/ttf2pk etc/ttf2pk/ttfonts.map usr/bin/ttf2bdf usr/bin/ttf2pfb usr/bin/ttf2pk usr/bin/ttf2tfm usr/bin/ttfbanner usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2bdf usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2bdf/README usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2pfb usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2pfb/TODO usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2pk usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2pk/BUGS usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2pk/dvidrv.doc usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2pk/README usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2pk/TODO usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttf2pk/ttf2pk.doc usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttfbanner usr/share/doc/packages/freetype-tools/freetype-tools-doc/ttfbanner/README usr/share/man/man1/ttf2bdf.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/ttf2pk.1.gz usr/share/man/man1/ttf2tfm.1.gz usr/share/texmf/ls-R usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/Big5.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/ET5.enc usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/EUC.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/SJIS.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/T1-WGL4.enc usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/ttfonts.map usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/UBg5plus.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/UBig5.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/UGBK.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/UGB.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/UJIS.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/UKS.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/Unicode.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2pk/VPS.rpl usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/Big5.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/ET5.enc usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/EUC.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/SJIS.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/T1-WGL4.enc usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/UBg5plus.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/UBig5.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/UGBK.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/UGB.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/UJIS.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/UKS.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/Unicode.sfd usr/share/texmf/ttf2tfm/VPS.rpl var/cache/fonts/ls-R var/lib/texmf/db/ls-R var/lib/texmf/doc/helpindex.html var/lib/texmf/ls-R However, most of these are in /usr and only a few are in /etc and /var. I assume that the 3 files in /etc and /var are not consuming more than 130 MB.... What goes wrong here? Created attachment 106516 [details]
Incorrect disk full error message
Lada, something seems to be very wrong here either with zypp::DiskUsage or with the underlying meta data. For confirmation, after installing 30 packages for mediawiki, with some complaints from yast about not enough diskspace the results is the following: suse102b2:/usr/tmp/install # df -kh Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 301M 172M 115M 60% / udev 189M 116K 189M 1% /dev /dev/hda11 100G 33M 100G 1% /home /dev/hda6 1.6G 1021M 517M 67% /opt /dev/hda9 1.6G 33M 1.5G 3% /tmp /dev/hda7 2.6G 2.1G 513M 81% /usr /dev/hda8 1.6G 331M 1.2G 22% /var /dev/hda10 1.6G 476M 1.1G 31% /var/tmp /dev/hdc 654M 654M 0 100% /mnt As you can see, each partition has enough space left. There is no need to give any errors during the installation. "/" obtained only 15 M additional files. The following packages were installed: mediawiki-plugins-1.7.1-21 Wed Nov 22 15:25:13 2006 mediawiki-1.8.2-8 Wed Nov 22 15:25:10 2006 apache2-mod_php5-5.2.0-6 Wed Nov 22 15:24:34 2006 cjk-latex-4.5.2-238 Wed Nov 22 15:24:14 2006 lilypond-2.8.7-10 Wed Nov 22 15:23:48 2006 apache2-2.2.3-16 Wed Nov 22 15:22:38 2006 php5-mysql-5.2.0-6 Wed Nov 22 15:22:24 2006 mftrace-1.2.5-8 Wed Nov 22 15:22:09 2006 apache2-prefork-2.2.3-16 Wed Nov 22 15:22:06 2006 php5-gettext-5.2.0-6 Wed Nov 22 15:22:02 2006 te_latex-3.0-54 Wed Nov 22 15:21:48 2006 php5-pdo-5.2.0-6 Wed Nov 22 15:17:56 2006 php5-zlib-5.2.0-6 Wed Nov 22 15:17:44 2006 tetex-3.0-54 Wed Nov 22 15:17:27 2006 libapr-util1-1.2.7-22 Wed Nov 22 15:00:10 2006 php5-5.2.0-6 Wed Nov 22 15:00:03 2006 ec-fonts-mftraced-1.0.12-33 Wed Nov 22 14:59:46 2006 latex-ucs-20041017-27 Wed Nov 22 14:59:08 2006 fontforge-20061014-10 Wed Nov 22 14:58:48 2006 mysql-shared-5.0.26-5 Wed Nov 22 14:57:28 2006 libapr1-1.2.7-19 Wed Nov 22 14:57:13 2006 graphviz-2.6-40 Wed Nov 22 14:57:10 2006 gd-2.0.32-45 Wed Nov 22 14:56:46 2006 mm-1.4.2-16 Wed Nov 22 14:56:43 2006 autotrace-0.31.1-400 Wed Nov 22 14:56:40 2006 libedit-2.9.snap20061022-4 Wed Nov 22 14:56:36 2006 freetype-tools-1.3.1-1189 Wed Nov 22 14:56:34 2006 t1utils-1.26-281 Wed Nov 22 14:56:27 2006 It's incrediable that it takes more than 30 minutes to install only 30 packages. Something should really be done about is. A collegue already started to use another distribution, because of this. That might be only 1 person to you, but he has quite some influence in the company, so it might not remain with only 1 person.... I know that this already reported in another bugreport, but this (incorrect disk space usage and slow installation) is fustrating. There are two problems in the slideshow callbacks:
The check tests only '/' directory ('/mnt' during installation), if many files are installed into another partitions then the calculated usage is wrong.
The second problem is that the test code is:
disk_usage + 2 * pkg_size > disk_capacity
So the package size is doubled (which is correct if the installation source is a FTP/HTTP source - the package must be downloaded to the local disk before installation), but if no download is required (e.g. NFS, CD, local source...) then its wrong. And of course the problem happens during installation of a big package like OpenOffice.org.
I have the same errors now on RC1, 32bit: /root: -750kb.. after an update: -1.8M free. After the warning, i get imediately the real values, showed in YaST2..though *** Bug 222512 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 233498 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Fixed in yast2-packager-2.15.4 |