Bug 256461

Summary: groupwise client cannot be started
Product: [openSUSE] openSUSE 10.3 Reporter: Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x <forgotten_ZhJd0F0L3x>
Component: X11 ApplicationsAssignee: Scott A Brown <sabrown>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Stefan Dirsch <sndirsch>
Severity: Major    
Priority: P5 - None    
Version: Alpha 2   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: Other   
OS: Other   
Whiteboard:
Found By: Component Test Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 245732    

Description Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2007-03-21 17:36:22 UTC 
I updated my machine to STABLE today and cannot start the groupwise client anymore:

seife@strolchi:~> groupwise
groupwise-bin: xcb_xlib.c:52: xcb_xlib_unlock: Assertion `c->xlib.lock' failed.
/usr/bin/groupwise: line 3: 10692 Aborted                 /opt/novell/groupwise/client/bin/groupwise-bin "$@"
Comment 1 Forgotten User ZhJd0F0L3x 2007-03-21 17:37:46 UTC 
package version is novell-groupwise-gwclient-7.0.2-20070314, reassigning to the package maintainer
Comment 2 Stefan Dirsch 2007-03-21 17:58:24 UTC 
See Bug #252510. It would be good to know, which Java implementation (SUN/IBM/BEA) is used by groupwise.
Comment 3 Stefan Dirsch 2007-03-21 18:02:49 UTC 
Looks like it's SUN Java 1.5.0.
Comment 4 Andreas Jaeger 2007-03-21 19:08:54 UTC 
This is indeed a duplicate.  Stefan you are correct in comment #3.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 252510 ***
Comment 5 Stefan Dirsch 2007-03-21 19:38:35 UTC 
Unfortunately this is not a duplicate, since groupwise ships its own copy of SUN Java.
Comment 6 Carlos Baptista 2007-04-13 17:55:56 UTC 
This bug also exists on OpenSuse 10.2 if you update from xorg72 to xorg73, from repositorie at software.opensuse.org.
Comment 7 Stefan Dirsch 2007-05-09 13:47:35 UTC 
Since Novell does *not* seem to have *any* contacts to SUN Java developers this needs to be workarounded with a wrapper script, which sets LIBXCB_ALLOW_SLOPPY_LOCK environment variable and executes the java binary
afterwards.
Comment 8 Christoph Thiel 2007-08-08 10:19:48 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 272662 ***