|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | rename and/or reorganize "community repositories" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.0 | Reporter: | Martin Schlander <martin.schlander> |
| Component: | YaST2 | Assignee: | Martin Schmidkunz <mschmidkunz> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Jiri Srain <jsrain> |
| Severity: | Enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | guitarist198, jsuchome, suse-beta |
| Version: | Beta 1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | 32bit | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Martin Schlander
2008-04-19 17:04:16 UTC
Concerning 1: No. The modules were separated before and after some discussion we finally agreed on merging them. The reason for this was that the distinction to less experienced users is not clear. Concerning 2: What about renaming "Community Repositories" into "Online Repositories" and adding a column in the repo list to indicate the support status (column: supported by, choices: "openSUSE", "Community")? I'm not sure about "Online Repositories", we already have some "Online" items in the control center and this could increase the confusion. Mhm. What about "Configured Repositories in the Network" (instead of "Scan Using SLP" which is quite unintuitive as well :-)) and "Configured Repositories in the Internet"? ping? I think this is part of some Lukas' module. #1 A column with support status "openSUSE" or "community" - or maybe alternatively "official" and "unofficial" sounds like a good idea, and should solve the problem. Another problem is that a lot of users seem to add all repos "just to be safe" (including database, mailserver or debug which clueless desktop users don't need) - not understanding the problems this might cause regarding conflicts, stability, package manager speed etc., maybe the repos could be somehow categorized into types of use or something - like "desktop", "server", "development" - maybe even in different tabs. #3 Not sure "configured repositores in network" and "configured repos in internet" is a good choice - "configured" could imply they're already added to the system. "Network" could be both internet and lan. How about: - "Available repositories on the local network", and; - "Available online repositories" It seems such requests should go to FATE. BTW: The proposed solution expects to have the repositories in table. So far, we don't support check boxes in table so adding a new column with extra information can't be used now. Anyway, if you click on a repository, an extra information is written below the list of repos. (In reply to comment #7 from Lukas Ocilka) > BTW: The proposed solution expects to have the repositories in table. So far, > we don't support check boxes in table so adding a new column with extra > information can't be used now. Hmm, what does yast2 sw_single use? (I guess it uses images instead of "real" checkboxes - but this solution could also be used here.) In 11.3 the module is named "Software Repositories" which seems fine for me. If there are any other requests, please use openFATE for them. Thanks! |