|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Low disk space warning when launching some yast modules. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.0 | Reporter: | Dean Hilkewich <deanjo> |
| Component: | YaST2 | Assignee: | Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Jiri Srain <jsrain> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P2 - High | ||
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | openSUSE 11.0 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | YaST2Logs | ||
|
Description
Dean Hilkewich
2008-06-15 17:48:49 UTC
This should not happen. Could you attach y2logs? If you are in doubt follow: http://en.opensuse.org/Bugs/YaST Thanks! Created attachment 222253 [details]
YaST2Logs
Here are the logs.
The problem is that YaST does not know whether it will need these partitions or not. Reading file list of all packages would bring really significant performance problems which would be much more annoying than confirming one warning. I don't think there is anything than a "Don't show this warning again" to do. Could you not simply have a option to ignore certain mounts? Warning pops up and then have a check box beside the mounts saying "ignore this mount on space check" so subsequent checks do not looks at them? Please read the Bugzilla help about bug severities. This is becoming an FAQ... There is no reasonable way to find out to which partitions files will be installed. Even if we did have file lists for all packages that are not installed (which we don't have and which we won't get because of disk space and network bandwith issues), there would be no reasonable way to figure out what symlinks might point to other partitions where typically no packages get installed. So we play it safe and include all Linunx partitions in that warning. As for some "don't display this again" checkbox somewhere: If you have a patch that implements this in a reliable way, we will gladly apply it. If not, I don't see a realistic chance for this. (In reply to comment #6 from Stefan Hundhammer) > This is becoming an FAQ... > > There is no reasonable way to find out to which partitions files will be > installed. Even if we did have file lists for all packages that are not > installed (which we don't have and which we won't get because of disk space and > network bandwith issues), there would be no reasonable way to figure out what > symlinks might point to other partitions where typically no packages get > installed. > > So we play it safe and include all Linunx partitions in that warning. > > > As for some "don't display this again" checkbox somewhere: If you have a patch > that implements this in a reliable way, we will gladly apply it. If not, I > don't see a realistic chance for this. > Looks like I'll be using Fedora for another semester in the school labs. Everyday more and more bugs get marked as "Won't Fix" for trivial little end-user interface bugs. If it's trivial and little, it can't be so hard to provide a patch. |