|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Yast2 sw_single needs to catogorize updates by date and not version | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.1 | Reporter: | Dave Plater <davejplater> |
| Component: | YaST2 | Assignee: | Thomas Göttlicher <tgoettlicher> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | QA Contact: | Jiri Srain <jsrain> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P4 - Low | ||
| Version: | Factory | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Dave Plater
2008-10-03 09:15:50 UTC
Which date are you talking about that could be used for figuring out which package is the latest? The build date can't be use because one could build an old package after a new package. The changelog is only available for installed packages. In my opinion the version tag is the only value that is usable for the decision whether a package is newer or older. If the version tag is wrong formated it's a bug from the package maintainer. Sorry for the late reply, internet was down. I was referring to the build date as that was my only way of telling which packages were older but you are 100% right the build service should not change their version tag formats which they have. For example I have yast2-pam-2.16.2-1.118 installed, build time Wed 01 Oct 2008 05:45:08 AM SAST which is the same as current factory, the previous version from the temporary factory which no longer exists is :- yast2-pam-2.16.2-1.120 build time Sat 20 Sep 2008 05:42:35 AM SAST but it is shown in yast as a newer version. If this problem will no longer occur then version tags are the best method. This is why I came to the conclusion that build time would be a more reliable method. |