|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | openbabel-2.2.0-4.40: missing return statement | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.1 | Reporter: | David Binderman <dcb314> |
| Component: | KDE4 Workspace | Assignee: | E-mail List <kde-maintainers> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Minor | ||
| Priority: | P4 - Low | CC: | forgotten_vXTZVacoSi |
| Version: | Factory | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | openSUSE 11.0 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 442933 *** (In reply to comment #1) > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 442933 *** I just checked version 2.2.0-4.81 of openbabel, some four months later, and the code is still broken. David this stuff is not openSUSE related, please tell this the guys from openbabel, opensuse is not responsible for fixing compiler warnings in upstream code... (In reply to comment #3) > opensuse is not responsible for fixing compiler warnings in upstream code... So why do most opensuse folks fix compiler warnings in upstream code, then ? I've never really understood the opensuse policy on bugs. Yes the opensuse front pages continue to ask for bug reports, but about one developer in ten just refuses to make the fix. Oh well - 90% is pretty good, 95% would be better. See http://en.opensuse.org/Bugs:KDE#Report_at_bugzilla.novell.com_or_bugs.kde.org.3F for the policy on handling KDE bugreports at openSUSE. Specifically for your compiler checks bugreports, you are just wasting time of busy people on very minor issues. If you reported these directly to the relevant projects, it would be almost the same work for you, and openSUSE developers would not have to repeat your work of reporting a problem. |
I just tried to build the OpenSuse factory package openbabel-2.2.0-4.40 and the compiler said mmcifformat.cpp:147: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void The source code is CIFResidueID & operator=(const CIFResidueID & other) { ChainNum = other.ChainNum; ResNum = other.ResNum; } Suggest code rework.