|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | procps-3.2.8-3.2: missing call to fclose | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.2 | Reporter: | David Binderman <dcb314> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | Dr. Werner Fink <werner> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | ||
| Version: | Factory | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | openSUSE 11.1 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | procps-3.2.8-fdleak.dif | ||
Created attachment 317550 [details]
procps-3.2.8-fdleak.dif
Curious ... but I feel like a waste basket ;)
David? Why do you not report upstream?
Added patch (In reply to comment #1) > Curious ... but I feel like a waste basket ;) Non comprendi. > David? Why do you not report upstream? One Novell account, where most (but not all) openSuse workers fix reported bugs, and file upstream, versus one account for each OpenSuse package (3200 or so ?) and I've got to file each one upstream myself ? For me, the trade-off is easy, even if a small percentage of openSuse workers nag me about reporting upstream ;-> |
I just had a look at factory package procps-3.2.8-3.2 For source code file procps-3.2.8/vmstat.c around line 420, function slabformat is the following code fSlab=fopen("/proc/slabinfo", "rb"); but I fail to find a matching call to fclose. This looks like a resource leak to me. Suggest add call to fclose.