|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | kernel/kmp: tilde support | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.2 | Reporter: | Jan Engelhardt <jengelh> |
| Component: | Kernel | Assignee: | Michal Marek <mmarek> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | kkaempf, mls |
| Version: | Factory | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Beta-Customer | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | patch | ||
|
Description
Jan Engelhardt
2009-09-20 11:20:22 UTC
Created attachment 318977 [details]
patch
'~' won't make anything worse than '_' with an unpatched rpm, so remove Depends On. This needs synchronization with rpm upstream first. (In reply to comment #2) > '~' won't make anything worse than '_' with an unpatched rpm, so remove Depends > On. With an unpatched rpm also doesn't fix anything, so there is little benefit in doing it before there is support in rpm. BTW a much more user-visible improvement would be the ability to encode the rc number into the rpm version (currently, mkspec more or less throws the -rcX string away). Humm, it is already encoded ("foo-kmp-rt-1.2.3_2.6.31_rc8-123.i586.rpm") or did I miss something?
Sorry, I had the kernels themselves in mind, there the rpm version is just the 2.6.X or 2.6.X.Y, without the -rc string. That is because your scripts strip it. I already mentioned that in #465113. The problem with KMPs you're trying to address is easily fixed by adding a .0 to the mainline kernel version encoded in the kmp version: foo-kmp-desktop-0.1_2.6.31.0_2.3-4.5.x86_64.rpm, I just committed this yesterday. For properly representing the kernel version in kernel packages, we have to wait for support in rpm. . For the record, this is ticket#56 in upstream tracker : http://rpm.org/ticket/56 |