|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | nepomuk notification requests 'redland' what is this? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.3 | Reporter: | Juergen Weigert <jw> |
| Component: | KDE4 Workspace | Assignee: | E-mail List <kde-maintainers> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | ctrippe |
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | notification screenshot | ||
|
Description
Juergen Weigert
2010-08-15 20:33:51 UTC
Created attachment 383030 [details]
notification screenshot
*** Bug 631326 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The package 'soprano-backend-redland' is missing. This is tracked in bug 619753. One additional remark: One thing I am not sure about. The error message claims that the configured database backend would be redland. AFAIK the normally used backend should be virtuoso. Can you please check if you have the line Used Soprano Backend=virtuosobackend in .kde4/share/config/nepomukserverrc yes, I have. I wasn't aware of the existance of this file. Possibly a leftover from 11.2? Should I delete it? (In reply to comment #4) > yes, I have. > I wasn't aware of the existance of this file. Possibly a leftover from 11.2? > Should I delete it? No, then everything should be ok. There was no virtuoso-backend in 11.2 and I only wanted to be sure that after the update to 11.3 the correct backend is used. Closing as dup of bug 619753 where the missing soprano-backend-redland is tracked. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 619753 *** |