Bug 635354

Summary: glibc-html is incomplete
Product: [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.2 Reporter: Christopher Yeleighton <giecrilj>
Component: InstallationAssignee: Michael Matz <matz>
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX QA Contact: Jiri Srain <jsrain>
Severity: Normal    
Priority: P5 - None CC: aj, matz
Version: Final   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: x86-64   
OS: openSUSE 11.2   
Whiteboard:
Found By: --- Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---

Description Christopher Yeleighton 2010-08-29 09:13:58 UTC 
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; pl-PL; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100714 SUSE/3.5.11-0.1.1 Ant.com Toolbar 2.0.1 Firefox/3.5.11

The information in glibc-html depends on information that should be in gcc44-html; however, the package gcc44-html does not exist.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
Install glibc-html.

2. 
Visit <URL:file:///usr/share/doc/glibc/Header-Files.html#Header-Files>.

3. Follow the hyperlink "Header Files".
Actual Results:  
2. 
For more information about the use of header files and ‘#include’ directives, see [Header Files].

3. 
<URL:file:///usr/share/doc/cpp/Header-Files.html#Header-Files>
Plik lub katalog nie istnieje

Expected Results:  
1. I suppose, glibc-html should draw gcc44-html.
Comment 1 Christopher Yeleighton 2010-08-29 09:16:35 UTC 
As a workaround, the document <URL:info:/cpp-4.4/Header%20Files> contains the relevant information.
Comment 2 Petr Baudis 2010-09-03 00:07:51 UTC 
Michael, why is there no gcc-html? Was there ever any?

If gcc-html was dropped, I wonder what the reasons were and whether they don't apply on glibc-html too.
Comment 3 Michael Matz 2010-09-03 13:01:20 UTC 
No, there never was a gcc-html package (versioned or not).  We neither generate
nor package any html documentation, except for libstdc++.  I don't think
we plan to change this.
Comment 4 Christopher Yeleighton 2010-09-04 08:37:27 UTC 
In view of that, since glibc-html depends on gcc-html, glibc-html should be discontinued.
Comment 6 Andreas Jaeger 2011-06-16 14:09:43 UTC 
Just because of this small error, we should not drop the whole thing. Let's leave it as it is.