|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | replaceable element should go to variables | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.3 | Reporter: | Kalman Kemenczy <kkemenczy> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | Thomas Schraitle <thomas.schraitle> |
| Status: | RESOLVED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Karl Eichwalder <ke> |
| Severity: | Enhancement | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | fs |
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 702276 | ||
|
Description
Kalman Kemenczy
2010-11-06 20:11:56 UTC
As we discussed in IRC, varname is more the name of a variable, whereas replaceable means the value. There might be places where this was not used consistently. I'm not sure what's the best procedure here... Kalman wants us to use entities (xml lingo); this is not about tagging with <varname> elements. Franks did some evaluation whether this is possible or not (mabye, we should use entities for consistency for often used "replaceables" such as "filename" or "path". I admit, I'm not that fond of it--but I'm not one of the main writers, though. Maybe, Frank wants to a comment. Is this still an issue? Do we want to support this? From a writers perspective, this could be a problem. Is it still an issue? I don't think so, so I'm setting it to resolved for the time being. If anybody thinks it it still important, please reopen it. |