|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Upgraded RC1 to GM, yet release tags still say "RC1" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.4 | Reporter: | Carlos Robinson <carlos.e.r> |
| Component: | libzypp | Assignee: | E-mail List <zypp-maintainers> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | ||
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | SUSE Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | requested yast logs | ||
|
Description
Carlos Robinson
2011-03-14 00:46:06 UTC
Please attach y2logs. If you are in doubt follow: http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Bugreport_YaST Thanks! Created attachment 420361 [details]
requested yast logs
Note: Looking at the logs I remembered that this system was previously 11.3, which I upgraded to 11.4 RC1 via DVD upgrade method. I actually did the procedure 4 times, restoring from backup (dd) each time to verify the upgrade procedure. I thought that I had finally done a new install, but looking at the logs I see that I did not.
I mention just in case it is of interest.
According to the log, your CD as well as the factory-snapshot_oss contained the openSUSE-release-11.4-1.36, while GA (http://download.opensuse.org/distribution/11.4/repo/oss) provides openSUSE-release-11.4-1.9. Almost looks like the CD contained a snapshot, OTOH also unlucky the the GA -release package has a lower version 1.9. But I currently don't see something that needs to be fixed in the final release. Over half a year later there is obviously nothing to solve :-( (it was not a CD, anyway) Sorry Carlos, you don't deserve lazy comments. It's been nothing to fix _in libzypp_, but.. ..the problem of decreasing build numbers is something we learned by this and other reports. Even if if it was not explicitly tracked here. And hopefully build service does a better job for 12.1. So 'invalid' was not the proper resolution. Thank you, I appreciate it. |