|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | blogd crashes on boot and "kills" the runlevel initialisation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 11.4 | Reporter: | kolA flash <kolAflash> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | E-mail List <bnc-team-screening> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | arne.reiter, forgotten_-QHEa95TGX, jes, werner |
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86-64 | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
kolA flash
2011-03-16 23:13:03 UTC
I've been bit by this. It prevents the box from booting. I think it should be a higher severity (critical). It does not occur consistently. It's like playing the wheel of misfortune. Here's the last of the info from my boot.log before the machine hung due to blogd. System Boot Control: Running /etc/init.d/boot.local done <notice -- Mar 16 20:11:34.660993000> killproc: kill(429,3) Boot logging started on /dev/tty1(/dev/console) at Wed Mar 16 20:11:34 2011 Master Resource Control: previous runlevel: N, switching to runlevel: 5 Master Resource Control: Running /etc/init.d/before.local done <notice -- Mar 16 20:11:34.872409000> service earlysyslog start<notice -- Mar 16 20:11:34.886670000> service dbus start<notice -- Mar 16 20:11:34.967933000> ser vice acpid start -------- /etc/init.d/boot.local is empty. Hmm... looks like #642289 BUT #642289 is marked as duplicate of #642334 and #642334 DOES NOT LOOK LIKE THIS/MY PROBLEM!!! BEFORE YOU ANYONE SETS THIS AS A DUPLICATE OF #642289 MARK #642289 AS >>>NOT RESOLVED<<< !!! Thanks :-) Just want to make sure, my bug doesn't gets lost :-) My notebook just started to show the same bug after installing some patches (via YaST). The notebook is also updated from openSUSE 11.3 (like my pc, where I experienced the bug the at first time). But the notebook has a 32 bit openSUSE. The patch which looks the most suspicious is for tha package "at". The other patches are for packages like Java or MPlayer. So they shouldn't be responsible for such a system-near bug. ... If I keep thinking a little longer: "at" shouldn't be responsible for breaking "blogd". It just doesn't makes sense. "at" is for job scheduling. It shouldn't break a tool logging the system boot. I didn't used my notebook since upgrading it from openSUSE 11.3 to 11.4. So maybe the bug already existed on my notebook before (since upgrading to 11.4), but just doesn't shows up every time. It seems also a problem taht somehow the fd 0 of blogd is stolen *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 642289 *** |