|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | binary re-release leads to resign with different checksum on rpm | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE 12.1 | Reporter: | Lars Müller <lmuelle> |
| Component: | Update Problems | Assignee: | Dirk Mueller <dmueller> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | Jiri Srain <jsrain> |
| Severity: | Critical | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | adrian.schroeter, boriss_vlassov, dmueller, forgotten_PoQ9LLo9Cj, maintenance, marc+novell, meissner, mls, mrueckert |
| Version: | Final | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | openSUSE 12.1 | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | Development | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | Yes | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
| Attachments: | zypper.log excerpt | ||
|
Description
Lars Müller
2012-03-13 17:56:22 UTC
Same applies to i586 but to a different package: Paket glibc-locale-2.14.1-14.25.1.i586 wird abgerufen (27/235), 5,8 MiB (111,5 MiB entpackt) Abruf: glibc-locale-2.14.1-14.25.1.i586.rpm [fertig (664,6 KiB/s)] Überprüfung für glibc-locale-2.14.1-14.25.1.i586.rpm fehlgeschlagen. Erwartet wurde 63c32a9fbdc0336862c08964155dfc03a3878dbc8f85bd2d717a19dfbe4e0a5a, gefunden wurde 791656e5114a1055c02920e7ffcfb42c55c1cba33f120fbfa31ec1dd1b3b5d69. Fortfahren? [ja/nein] (nein): Maybe a broken mirror? Created attachment 481249 [details]
zypper.log excerpt
yep, here the same.....
i think i used to have a bugreport about these zypper digest errors and the mirros being not properly equipped with proper metadata, or payload data or whatever the whole mess about this time ;(
no, our metadata is probably bad *** Bug 752118 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 752116 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Uni-Ulm has a different rpm then the others, so I disabled that mirror for now. However, the problem seems to be on our side, because the rpm got re-signed a second time. Most likely due to the re-release of the update. Why is this assigned to me? No idea what happened, I've rebuilt and rereleased glibc to avoid the different variatns of the files flying around. *** Bug 751653 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |