Bug 801304

Summary: xorg, errror laoding glamoregl
Product: [openSUSE] openSUSE 12.2 Reporter: Episteme PROMENEUR <epistemepromeneur>
Component: X.OrgAssignee: E-mail List <xorg-maintainer-bugs>
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX QA Contact: E-mail List <xorg-maintainer-bugs>
Severity: Normal    
Priority: P3 - Medium    
Version: Final   
Target Milestone: ---   
Hardware: x86-64   
OS: openSUSE 12.2   
Whiteboard:
Found By: --- Services Priority:
Business Priority: Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: --- IT Deployment: ---
Attachments: xorg log

Description Episteme PROMENEUR 2013-01-30 16:40:28 UTC 
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0

i have 2 errors concerning glamoregl in xorg log

4] 	ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 6.0
[    25.604] (II) Loading extension DRI2
[    25.604] (II) LoadModule: "glamoregl"
[    25.604] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so
[    27.213] (EE) Failed to load /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so: /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/libglamoregl.so: undefined symbol: _glapi_tls_Context
[    28.750] (II) UnloadModule: "glamoregl"
[    28.750] (II) Unloading glamoregl
[    28.750] (EE) Failed to load module "glamoregl" (loader failed, 7)
[    28.750] (II) LoadModule: "extmod"
[    28.751] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libextmod.so

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Stefan Dirsch 2013-01-31 02:38:46 UTC 
Most likely you have a proprietary graphics driver installed, which replace libGL. Please attach the complete logfile.
Comment 2 Episteme PROMENEUR 2013-01-31 07:17:38 UTC 
Created attachment 522765 [details]
xorg log

nvidia 304.64 is installed
Comment 3 Stefan Dirsch 2013-01-31 11:37:32 UTC 
Ok. Either ignore this issue or uninstall glamor, xf86-video-intel, xf86-video-ati and org-x11-driver-video. 3rd option. Remove the glarmoregl line
in /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/05-glamor.conf.

I don't see how to fix this for real at the moment.
Comment 4 Episteme PROMENEUR 2013-01-31 13:07:39 UTC 
if i understand, in case of using nvidia driver :
- glamoregl is useless
- this does not lead to system, app etc fail

right ?
Comment 5 Stefan Dirsch 2013-01-31 13:17:59 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> if i understand, in case of using nvidia driver :
> - glamoregl is useless
> - this does not lead to system, app etc fail
> 
> right ?

Correct.