|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | installation summary talks about "Default runlevel" | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE Tumbleweed | Reporter: | Per Jessen <per> |
| Component: | YaST2 | Assignee: | Jiří Suchomel <jsuchome> |
| Status: | RESOLVED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Jiri Srain <jsrain> |
| Severity: | Minor | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | bwiedemann, kigurame |
| Version: | 13.1 Beta 1 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Per Jessen
2013-09-26 07:50:49 UTC
Runlevels are "Targets" in systemd. However there are systemd targets that mimic the common SystemVinit runlevels. Would sticking with the more familiar Runlevels nomenclature be preferable to avoid confusion ? (In reply to comment #1) > Runlevels are "Targets" in systemd. However there are systemd targets that > mimic the common SystemVinit runlevels. Would sticking with the more familiar > Runlevels nomenclature be preferable to avoid confusion ? Mixing systemd/sysvinit nomenclature would surely only bring confusion. systemd has come to stay, we should be consequent and use systemd nomenclature. assigning to Jiri as he is the maintainer of yast2-installation This is actually part of bug 838197 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 838197 *** |