|
Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing |
| Summary: | Change libqt5-creator name to qt5-creator | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [openSUSE] openSUSE Tumbleweed | Reporter: | Ronan Chagas <ronisbr> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | Forgotten User sM9JzehKpy <forgotten_sM9JzehKpy> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | QA Contact: | E-mail List <qa-bugs> |
| Severity: | Normal | ||
| Priority: | P5 - None | CC: | forgotten_DV81ZEWZkN, foss, os-dev, qantas94heavy, w01dnick |
| Version: | Current | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Other | ||
| OS: | Other | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Found By: | --- | Services Priority: | |
| Business Priority: | Blocker: | --- | |
| Marketing QA Status: | --- | IT Deployment: | --- |
|
Description
Ronan Chagas
2015-11-05 09:07:26 UTC
Discussion on the factory mailinglist with general Andreas Schwab's general confirmation that it is not a library package: http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2015-11/msg00189.html I created request 342938 which prepares the renaming of the package. The renaming was accepted, there is now a package KDE:Qt5/qt5-creator. But it is disabled ad KDE:Qt5/libqt5-creator seems to remain the default. I don't know why my request got accepted under this cirumstances. Maybe renaming it to qt-creator instead of the wrong name qt5-creator would be a better idea. We should defiantly get rid of either libqt5-creator or qt5-creator. The current situation is insane. Yeah this is not right. The package is not a library, it is an application. It is not created from within the Qt library sources, it is separate from the libraries. It is called "Qt Creator". The file you download with sources is called "qt-creator-opensource-src-[version].tar.gz". The binary which runs the application is "/usr/bin/qtcreator". The package used to be called "qt-creator". With all that, why in the world is the package now titled libqt5-creator? I don't even see why it would be necessary to call it qt5-creator, I think qt-creator was just fine. I can branch and make requests in OBS, but I don't know what a package name change would look like or how to execute it. I also don't know what you need to put in the spec file to get RPM to understand that yes, we did just change this package from "qt-creator" to "libqt5-creator" and back to "qt-creator" (or whatever we decide to change it to). I think this should be closed, as with introduction of Qt Creator 6 there are qt5-creator and qt6-creator now and no confusing lib prefix. (Hope it's ok if I close it) |