Bug 985153

Summary:	GCC6: cross-ppc-binutils fails to build
Product:	[openSUSE] openSUSE Tumbleweed	Reporter:	Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar>
Component:	Other	Assignee:	Richard Biener <rguenther>
Status:	RESOLVED INVALID	QA Contact:	E-mail List <qa-bugs>
Severity:	Normal
Priority:	P5 - None	CC:	dimstar
Version:	Current
Target Milestone:	---
Hardware:	Other
OS:	Other
Whiteboard:
Found By:	---	Services Priority:
Business Priority:		Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---	IT Deployment:	---
Bug Depends on:
Bug Blocks:	984984

Description Dominique Leuenberger 2016-06-16 13:36:48 UTC

Since the update to GCC6, openSUSE:Factory/ cross-ppc-binutils fails to build

Comment 1 Dominique Leuenberger 2016-06-16 21:23:24 UTC

[  217s] 
[  217s] 		=== ld Summary ===
[  217s] 
[  217s] # of expected passes		500
[  217s] # of unexpected failures	2
[  217s] # of expected failures		1
[  217s] # of untested testcases		20
[  217s] # of unsupported tests		25
[  217s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/binutils-2.26/build-dir/ld/ld-new -znorelro --hash-style=sysv 2.26.0.20160309-2
[  217s]

Comment 2 Richard Biener 2016-06-27 08:18:15 UTC

I see in devel:gcc

cross-ppc-binutils      openSUSE_Factory_PPC ppc64      failed
cross-ppc-binutils      openSUSE_Factory_PPC ppc64le    succeeded
cross-ppc-binutils      openSUSE_Factory_ARM armv7l     succeeded
cross-ppc-binutils      openSUSE_Factory_ARM aarch64    failed
cross-ppc-binutils      openSUSE_Factory     i586       succeeded
cross-ppc-binutils      openSUSE_Factory     x86_64     succeeded

so on which arch?

> osc results openSUSE:Factory cross-ppc-binutils
totest               x86_64     disabled
totest               i586       disabled
standard             x86_64     succeeded*
standard             i586       succeeded*
snapshot             x86_64     disabled
snapshot             i586       disabled
ports                ppc64      disabled
ports                ppc        disabled
ports                armv6l     disabled
ports                aarch64    disabled
images               local      excluded
images               i586       excluded
images               x86_64     excluded

Comment 3 Dominique Leuenberger 2016-06-27 16:09:13 UTC

This seems to have been a random/unrelated build issue appearing the same day:

>2016-04-25 18:30:17  cross-ppc-binutils                                 meta change      unchanged                4m 53s   lamb08:6        
>2016-06-16 02:39:25  cross-ppc-binutils                                 meta change      failed               8h  3m 52s   lamb03:2        
>2016-06-19 08:56:31  cross-ppc-binutils                                 new build        succeeded                3m 40s   lamb20:3    

Let's close it as invalid in this case.