1034899 – Segfault in cscope 15.8b

Bug 1034899 - Segfault in cscope 15.8b

Summary: Segfault in cscope 15.8b

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1033198

Alias:	None

Product:	openSUSE Tumbleweed
Classification:	openSUSE
Component:	Development (show other bugs)
Version:	Current
Hardware:	Other Other

Priority:	P5 - None Severity: Normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	Dr. Werner Fink
QA Contact:	E-mail List

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Clone This Bug

Reported:	2017-04-19 09:37 UTC by Howard Guo
Modified:	2017-04-24 06:40 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By:	---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---
IT Deployment:	---

Flags:	werner: needinfo? (hguo)

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Howard Guo 2017-04-19 09:37:48 UTC

On a freshly installed Tumbleweed (20170419), cscope segfaults on start.

Without installing debug info packages, the stack trace looks like:

#0  0x00007f46210f7bb2 in _nc_init_acs_sp () from /lib64/libtinfo.so.6
#1  0x00007f462132d9c0 in ?? () from /lib64/libncurses.so.6
#2  0x00007f4621329b11 in newterm_sp () from /lib64/libncurses.so.6
#3  0x00007f4621326206 in initscr () from /lib64/libncurses.so.6
#4  0x00000000004036de in ?? ()
#5  0x00007f4620d67541 in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6

Comment 1 Stephan Kulow 2017-04-19 09:59:07 UTC

smells like 1034810

Comment 2 Dr. Werner Fink 2017-04-24 06:22:46 UTC

Do you have checked this with the latestr ncurses from project Base:System ?

With the last change

 Thu Apr 13 13:16:58 UTC 2017 - werner@suse.de
 - With one of the latest update patches libtinfo now has become
   splitted into a normal and wide character version (boo#1033198) 

this one might be become fixed as well

Comment 3 Dr. Werner Fink 2017-04-24 06:33:14 UTC

Check against latest ncurses from Base:System

Comment 4 Dr. Werner Fink 2017-04-24 06:38:52 UTC

What is the reason for not accepting SR#487834

Comment 5 Dr. Werner Fink 2017-04-24 06:40:37 UTC

Dup boo#1033198

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1033198 ***