Bug 304779 - Abort doesn't abort
Summary: Abort doesn't abort
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 450273
: 246048 270823 (view as bug list)
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE 10.3
Classification: openSUSE
Component: YaST2 (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 2
Hardware: Other Other
: P3 - Medium : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ladislav Slezák
QA Contact: Jiri Srain
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-27 10:00 UTC by Anders Johansson
Modified: 2009-04-08 22:06 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments
y2log from installation (4.75 MB, text/plain)
2007-08-30 16:09 UTC, Anders Johansson
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Anders Johansson 2007-08-27 10:00:40 UTC
In the installer, I received a popup that the kernel rpm failed to install. So I clicked on "abort", to go back to redo the partitioning, but the installer didn't abort, it just continued installing
Comment 1 Cyril Hrubis 2007-08-28 17:25:37 UTC
Please attach y2logs. If you are in doubt follow:

http://en.opensuse.org/Bugs/YaST

Thanks!
Comment 2 Anders Johansson 2007-08-30 16:09:55 UTC
Created attachment 161030 [details]
y2log from installation

Here it is. It seems there are quite a few problems with the installer. Packages being installed twice, or in the wrong order etc
Comment 3 Anders Johansson 2007-08-30 16:11:16 UTC
removing needinfo
Comment 6 Stanislav Visnovsky 2007-09-07 11:29:10 UTC
Bug is still there in Beta3.
Comment 7 Lukas Ocilka 2007-09-12 17:02:42 UTC
*** Bug 270823 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Lukas Ocilka 2007-09-13 07:23:17 UTC
*** Bug 246048 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Ladislav Slezák 2009-01-15 14:40:27 UTC
This is a duplicate of bug #450273.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 450273 ***
Comment 10 Gerald Pfeifer 2009-04-08 22:06:53 UTC
I will note that marking a bug with the number #304779 as a duplicate
of a big with a number 50% larger is, hmm, interesting.  But then my
original bug which was duped to this one had the number #246048. :-O  

Overall I'm happy this got addressed.  Thanks!