Bug 325798 - Xvnc uses all the CPU it can after a machine has been portscanned
Summary: Xvnc uses all the CPU it can after a machine has been portscanned
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE 10.3
Classification: openSUSE
Component: X11 Applications (show other bugs)
Version: Beta 3
Hardware: Other openSUSE 10.3
: P5 - None : Normal with 5 votes (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Reinhard Max
QA Contact: Stefan Dirsch
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-09-17 20:07 UTC by Michael Wolf
Modified: 2008-08-13 16:50 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Wolf 2007-09-17 20:07:30 UTC
Xvnc uses all the CPU it can after a machine has been portscanned.

Steps to reproduce:

1) Install and activate Xvnc (I have xorg-x11-Xvnc)

2) From a different box, run nmap against the machine where Xvnc is enabled

3) On the target machine, watch top -- Xvnc will show up as one of the top consumers of CPU
Comment 1 Michael Wolf 2007-09-17 20:08:33 UTC
Woops, forgot to mention that this doesn't happen if you do "nmap localhost".

However, a similar problem exists on 10.2 -- AFAICT it is the same, with the following exception: the problem _does_ occur if you do "nmap localhost".
Comment 2 Stefan Dirsch 2007-09-17 21:07:10 UTC
What do you mean with activate Xvnc? Run it manually or enable remote configuration with YaST2?
Comment 3 Michael Wolf 2007-09-17 21:12:45 UTC
(In reply to comment #2 from Stefan Dirsch)
> What do you mean with activate Xvnc? Run it manually or enable remote
> configuration with YaST2?

The latter - configuring remote administration via yast, and poking a hole in the firewall if necessary.
Comment 4 Stefan Dirsch 2007-09-17 21:41:35 UTC
I can reproduce this issue. It doesn not happen, when you run Xvnc manually with the same options. Maybe Reinhard has an idea.
Comment 5 Reinhard Max 2008-08-13 16:50:34 UTC
Whoops, this one is still sitting in my bug list.

Having no 10.3 installations left here, I just tried it on 11.0, first with the Xvnc and xinetd packages from 11.0 and then with the ones from 10.3 and couldn't reproduce it.

As I think this isn't emportant enough for finding and fixing it in 10.3 at this point, I'll close it with WONTFIX.

Please re-open if you manage to reproduce it in 11.0 and provide more details, e.g. on the architecture of the involved machines and on the options you gave to nmap.