Bug 465221 - cyberjack usb device node wrong permissions
Summary: cyberjack usb device node wrong permissions
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 438131
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE 11.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Version: RC 1
Hardware: All openSUSE 11.1
: P5 - None : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-mail List
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-01-11 20:29 UTC by Wolfgang Rosenauer
Modified: 2009-01-12 10:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Found By: Customer
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
fdi (2.13 KB, text/plain)
2009-01-12 08:35 UTC, Wolfgang Rosenauer 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wolfgang Rosenauer 2009-01-11 20:29:53 UTC 
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008121300 SUSE/3.0.5-2.5 Firefox/3.0.5
Build Identifier: 

In the past the cyberjack cardreader was accessible from people using the desktop by defining a hal policy.
(see package ctapi-cyberjack file /etc/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor/80-cyberjack.fdi)

This doesn't seem to work on 11.1 anymore.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2009-01-11 22:58:44 UTC 
Ok, I've found bug 438867 which seems to be basically the same issue.
But I'm not completely sure what needs to be done for the cyberjack reader.

20-acl-management.fdi contains no sections for cardreaders but actually they are similar to fingerprint-readers.
Comment 2 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2009-01-12 08:35:37 UTC 
Created attachment 264408 [details]
fdi

With the information in the other bug I created this fdi file and copied it to /usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/20thirdparty. But either the location or the content is bad since it doesn't help anything.
Interestingly lshal still shows the resmgr.class for the device even when I've deleted the /etc/hal/fdi file where it was defined. I couldn't find out where this information is still cached or similar.
Comment 3 Wolfgang Rosenauer 2009-01-12 08:37:42 UTC 
Assigning to Stanislav as maintainer.
Ludwig, could you please give a hint what's wrong and what's the right way to do that?
Comment 4 Ludwig Nussel 2009-01-12 10:09:46 UTC 
dup of 438131

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 438131 ***