Bug 485543 - libproxy: the plugins need to be provided as -32bit too
Summary: libproxy: the plugins need to be provided as -32bit too
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE 11.2
Classification: openSUSE
Component: GNOME (show other bugs)
Version: Factory
Hardware: x86-64 Other
: P2 - High : Critical (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dominique Leuenberger
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-03-16 09:58 UTC by Dominique Leuenberger
Modified: 2009-06-17 01:18 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: Community User
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dominique Leuenberger 2009-03-16 09:58:52 UTC 
On x86_64, libproxy0-32bit is required by libsoup-2_4-1-32bit, which is perfectly fine.

But: libproxy0 on it's own does not offer any functionality. The plugins also need to be provided in their -32bit capabilities.

the plugins are installed by recommends: packageand() mechanism at the moment.

Severity Major: the library is not able to perform as expected by gnome upstream in this constellation. (It will always fall back to direct://)
Comment 1 Stanislav Brabec 2009-03-18 10:58:39 UTC 
Please see also bug 354164 comment 12. There is a change to generate these symbols automatically.
Comment 2 Dominique Leuenberger 2009-06-16 11:07:07 UTC 
Is there anything I can help here? As co-author of this prog I have somewhat an interest of it being functional :)

I tried playing with supplements: packageand() in baselibs.conf, but whatever I do seems not to work.
Comment 3 Magnus Boman 2009-06-16 11:18:22 UTC 
Dominique,

Have a look at baselibs.conf in gnome-keyring
Comment 4 Dominique Leuenberger 2009-06-16 11:42:52 UTC 
Thanks Magnus. I'll try to fix this issue and create an SR soon.
Comment 5 Vincent Untz 2009-06-17 01:17:43 UTC 
Thanks Dominique, accepted in G:F since it seemed sane to me.
Comment 6 Vincent Untz 2009-06-17 01:18:24 UTC 
(couldn't close without removing the bug dep first)