725976 – Install S/W selection gets "UI Syntax Error" loading qt-pkg

Bug 725976 - Install S/W selection gets "UI Syntax Error" loading qt-pkg

Summary: Install S/W selection gets "UI Syntax Error" loading qt-pkg

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 725722

Alias:	None

Product:	openSUSE 12.1
Classification:	openSUSE
Component:	Installation (show other bugs)
Version:	RC 1
Hardware:	x86-64 Other

Priority:	P5 - None Severity: Major (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	E-mail List
QA Contact:	Jiri Srain

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Clone This Bug

Reported:	2011-10-22 21:23 UTC by Mario Guzman
Modified:	2011-10-26 08:09 UTC (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Found By:	---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker:	---
Marketing QA Status:	---
IT Deployment:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Mario Guzman 2011-10-22 21:23:18 UTC

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1

During installation, at the point of selecting Software, the next screen shows "UI Syntax Error could not load plug-in qt-pkg"

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install
2.
3.
Actual Results:  
Circle goes around forever, reboot required.

Expected Results:  
Software selection screen should show up.

Options I selected are: Pacific Time, Custom Partitioning (LVM), Root formatted XFS, Use volumes IDs to mount, Do not Install Boot Manager, Disable Firewall. 12.1 install worked on the last Beta version so a change since then broke it.

Comment 1 andy norrie 2011-10-23 18:13:52 UTC

I get the same error. I have tried both 32 and 64 bit versions of build 379. It will install as long as you do not try to alter any of the "Software Selections".

Comment 2 Mario Guzman 2011-10-23 19:18:41 UTC

Found this to be same as bug 725874. I am using 64 bit DVD to install.

Comment 3 Gabriele Mohr 2011-10-26 08:09:57 UTC

It's a duplicate of bug #725874 resp. #725722.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 725722 ***