Bug 726488 - Docky should depend on libwnck-1-22
Summary: Docky should depend on libwnck-1-22
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 738011
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE 12.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: GNOME (show other bugs)
Version: Factory
Hardware: x86-64 Other
: P5 - None : Normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: E-mail List
QA Contact: E-mail List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-10-25 21:21 UTC by Lionel Dricot
Modified: 2012-06-26 21:11 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lionel Dricot 2011-10-25 21:21:33 UTC
User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/7.0.1

Docky doesn't work on a GNOME 3 desktop because the libwnck-1 dependancy is missing.


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. zypper in docky
2. launch docky
Actual Results:  
it crashes

Expected Results:  
liwnck should be a dependancy of docky
Comment 1 Vincent Untz 2011-10-26 04:56:56 UTC
It's actually a bug in the wnck-sharp package, which apparently doesn't bring in the library...

Stephen, Nelson: can you take a look at that?
Comment 2 Bernhard Wiedemann 2012-01-20 15:00:08 UTC
This is an autogenerated message for OBS integration:
This bug (726488) was mentioned in
https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/100931 12.1 / gnome-desktop-sharp2
Comment 3 Ruediger Oertel 2012-01-24 13:22:37 UTC
hi, can you have a look at the specfile and change it so that it works with the current specfile validator ?

this would work:
-Version:        %_version
-Release:        2
-Source:         %{_name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Version:        %{_version}
+Release:        0
+%if %{gnome_version} >= 226
+Source:         %{_name}-2.26.0.tar.bz2
+%else
+%if %{gnome_version} >= 224
+Source:         %{_name}-2.24.0.tar.bz2
+%else
+Source:         %{_name}-2.20.1.tar.bz2
+%endif
+%endif
Comment 4 Dominique Leuenberger 2012-06-26 21:11:55 UTC
This is tracked in another bug as well... the SR was rejected and needs more work!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 738011 ***