Bug 752118 - Patch "openSUSE-2012-160 - glibc: fix clock_gettime call" - Wrong Digest - patch packages have incorrect checksums.
Summary: Patch "openSUSE-2012-160 - glibc: fix clock_gettime call" - Wrong Digest - pa...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 752092
Alias: None
Product: openSUSE 12.1
Classification: openSUSE
Component: Installation (show other bugs)
Version: Final
Hardware: x86-64 openSUSE 12.1
: P5 - None : Critical (vote)
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Steffen Winterfeldt
QA Contact: Jiri Srain
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-13 20:59 UTC by Boriss Vlassov
Modified: 2012-03-14 07:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Found By: ---
Services Priority:
Business Priority:
Blocker: ---
Marketing QA Status: ---
IT Deployment: ---

Attachments
Screenshot of the problem for glibc patch openSUSE-2012-160. (78.00 KB, image/png)
2012-03-13 20:59 UTC, Boriss Vlassov 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Boriss Vlassov 2012-03-13 20:59:09 UTC 
Created attachment 481276 [details]
Screenshot of the problem for glibc patch openSUSE-2012-160.

User-Agent:       Opera/9.80 (X11; Linux x86_64; U; en) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.61

Incorrect checksums for patch openSUSE-2012-160 packages.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start Yast2.
2. Choose Online Update.
3. Try to install recommended patch "openSUSE-2012-160 - glibc: fix clock_gettime call", update server is http://download.opensuse.org/update/12.1/ (not mirror).
Actual Results:  
Patch processing failed.

Expected Results:  
A correct patch should be uploaded or update-server have a security problem.

Incorrect checksums for patch openSUSE-2012-160 packages.
Comment 1 andreas bittner 2012-03-13 21:22:07 UTC 
probably dupe of

https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752092
Comment 2 Marcus Meissner 2012-03-14 06:57:31 UTC 
is probably just a bug

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 752092 ***
Comment 3 Kun Kun Zhang 2012-03-14 07:33:48 UTC 
dupe of the bug 752092